Two days after Badlapur sex assault accused Akshay Shinde was shot dead in custody, the Bombay High Court asked tough questions to police about the circumstances leading to the 24-year-old’s death. The court was hearing a petition by Shinde’s father, who has alleged that his son was killed in a fake encounter and has demanded a probe by a Special Investigation Team.
Akshay Shinde (24) was accused of sexually assaulting two minor girls at a school in Badlapur where he worked as a sweeper. He was being taken from Taloja Jail to Badlapur Monday when he snatched a policeman’s pistol and opened fire. An assistant inspector was injured and Shinde was killed in retaliatory firing, police have said.
Addressing the bench of Justice Revati Mohite Dere and Justice Prithviraj Chavan, petitioner Anna Shinde’s counsel said the accused met his parents a day before the incident and was in no mental state to perform any of the acts alleged by the police.
“In the present case, the police is deciding who is convicted. The rule of law must prevail. This is setting a bad example (and) encouraging police to commit such…,” the counsel said, seeking a court-monitored probe into Shinde’s death.
When the court questioned the cause of death, the state government’s counsel replied, “bullet wound on the left thigh”. The public prosecutor said the pistol allegedly snatched by Shinde could be unlocked in two ways. “One way is pulling the upper portion, the deceased pulled the slider, it popped and he fired,” he said.
The court, however, said this is “hard to believe”. “It requires strength for the slider to pop. (A) layman cannot fire a pistol unless he is trained, (a) revolver is different,” the bench said. “According to you, he fired three bullets. Only one hit the police officer. What about the others?” the court asked.
The court then pointed out that the accused should have been shot below the knee, but the state government responded that the cop who shot him “did not have time to think”. “How could we believe that the police could not overpower the accused?” the court asked.
READ: D Fadnavis’ Pic On ‘Badla Pura’ Posters After Sex Assault Accused Shot Dead
“Till he fired three shots, where were you? You could have easily overpowered (him). It is not like he was a hefty man. This can’t be termed as an encounter. This is not an encounter,” the court added.
The bench asked if there were CCTV cameras on the route. The state government responded that footage of all CCTV cameras on the route will be checked. “We expect the investigation to be impartial. If we see something, we will be inclined to pass an order,” the court said.
The court questioned why the case papers have not been handed over to the state CID yet. “Time is of the essence in any investigation. Delay will lead to suspicion among the public. What prevented you from handling the papers yesterday?” The court said the call data records of all the five occupants of the police vehicle — four officers and the accused — should be collected.
